понедельник, 2 января 2012 г.
воскресенье, 1 января 2012 г.
Only one history as discipline really will learn to nothing
Prevalence in a science of scholastic approaches gives rise to substitution of value of concepts both the science as a whole, and its displays in concrete disciplines
It is especially brightly expressed on an example of use of the historical approach concerning humanitarian disciplines of philology, philosophy, cultural science, art criticism, etc.
When we use steady expression, that "the history learns us to nothing", its treatment is double: besides, that directly approach to a historical material depends only on pressing needs of ruling elite, is not objective in the necessary measure, and it conducts to wrong giving of a scientific material, that naturally affects absence of productivity of similar scientific search, and after - both its teaching, and mastering.
The simplified approach means cannot initially learn to take lessons from history not to repeat the moments of miscalculations and wrongly undertaken decisions of historically significant persons, whishes basically are all without an exception, but the developed stereotypes in any sciences give "heros" significant for concrete circumstances and time, though a role of each person in history the hugest.
Let's add, that aforementioned steady expression already contains negation of exclusively historical approach both to the history, and to other humanities. That is to read follows so: "Only one history as discipline really will learn to nothing"
It is especially brightly expressed on an example of use of the historical approach concerning humanitarian disciplines of philology, philosophy, cultural science, art criticism, etc.
When we use steady expression, that "the history learns us to nothing", its treatment is double: besides, that directly approach to a historical material depends only on pressing needs of ruling elite, is not objective in the necessary measure, and it conducts to wrong giving of a scientific material, that naturally affects absence of productivity of similar scientific search, and after - both its teaching, and mastering.
The simplified approach means cannot initially learn to take lessons from history not to repeat the moments of miscalculations and wrongly undertaken decisions of historically significant persons, whishes basically are all without an exception, but the developed stereotypes in any sciences give "heros" significant for concrete circumstances and time, though a role of each person in history the hugest.
Let's add, that aforementioned steady expression already contains negation of exclusively historical approach both to the history, and to other humanities. That is to read follows so: "Only one history as discipline really will learn to nothing"
for me the times
For me - The Times
It is The Times,when I should go
And for me - any Space
It is for me - not for you
For you - not I
Мне - (пэўны) Час (часіны)
Мне Час ісці...
Мне і прастора...
Мне - не табе
Табе - не Я...
It is The Times,when I should go
And for me - any Space
It is for me - not for you
For you - not I
Мне - (пэўны) Час (часіны)
Мне Час ісці...
Мне і прастора...
Мне - не табе
Табе - не Я...